vrijdag 6 november 2015
Present: Ambika, Eric, Fredrik, Mark, Petri, Trevor, Yvonne
To begin with we all wanted to define intelligence. Intelligent comes from rational,…the lat. word intellegere means to perceive, comprehend,…from inter (between) and legere (choose or read) actually : reading between the lines or picture…There are different kinds of intelligence : and we are moving towards ever new definitions of intelligence. (rational, spacial, language-wise, emotional, cognitive, physical…etc). In an artificial system, intelligence is defined as simply: the ability to adapt… or connecting ideas…The result of the judgement
maandag 5 oktober 2015
…”we zijn geobsedeerd met groei…”—uitspraak van Fritjof Capra.
We besloten eerst het thema scherp te krijgen.
Ik beloofde de etymologische betekenis van groei na te kijken. ECONOMIE = [staathuiskunde, zuinigheid …’huishoudkunde’, oikos = [huis] en nomos [ gewoonte, manier, wet] …
De vraag deed zich voor of er ook groei was zonder ontwikkeling,…
dan hadden we weer een nieuwe term bij die we ook eerst wilden definiëren. Ontwikkeling (ontwikkelen = ontvouwen,…van fr. développer)…en wat was dan obsessie [= dwangvoorstelling van lat. obsessio = belegering, blokkade] ook van obsedere [geheel in beslag nemen/hinderen, ergeren, lastig vallen, zitten op, bezet houden, belegeren, in beslag nemen]…
Groei is goed,…ontwikkeling is goed,…toch ?
…er kwam een tegengeluid `overdrive´ werd genoemd als een symptoom dat zich in verschillende
maandag 28 september 2015
We discussed the 37th passage of the Tao Te CHing
The Tao never does anything, yet still everything is done by her/him.
Could mighty men and women nestle in its heart the whole world would change through herself, in her natural rhythm. Humans were joyful with their simple, everyday lives, harmonious and without needs.
If there is no need,
everything is in peace.
Long time we circled the term desire. What was desire and how could we really live without it ? In Buddhism desire is the cause of all suffering said Greg. One of the guests could define the state when desire was no more and just being or floating was achieved. Then, he said, many things go by itself,…it’s as if without desire
maandag 24 augustus 2015
Aanwezig : Petrie, Hans, Frederik, Ambika, Gert-Jan, Brad
Als introductie voor het thema nam ik een uitspraak van Anna Lappé: “Every time you make a purchase, you’re casting a vote for the kind of world you want!” [ Iedere keer dat je een aankoop doet kies je voor het soort wereld die je wilt. ]
Hoe bewust zijn we ons van wat wij als verbruiker bepalen in de wereld in die we leven ? De meest voor de ogen liggende keuze die we zonet allemaal hadden gemaakt waren onze drankjes. Petrie neemt nooit coca cola (obesitas). Zij is zich daarvan bewust,…denkt aan de mogelijke gevolgen. Dat is wat verantwoordelijkheid is: aan de gevolgen denken,…responsibility (heeft het woord ‘respond’ in zich,…in het Nederlands is het antwoord. Het thema is daarom: Hoe veel denken we aan de gevolgen van ons doen/denken/zeggen ? En hoe ver in de toekomst denken we,…hoe ver kunnen
woensdag 12 augustus 2015
THE MYTH OF ER
Refering to our conversation with Bernadette, Rudi, Gert-Jan and Brad about the implications of Plato’s vision in the Myth of ER (The Republic).(Tuesday, 21 st July 2015)
What is virtuous ?
We know that our choices are not always conscious.
Mistakes are on the way – they are part of a learning process.
Is there a blueprint for happiness ?
What does a fully flourishing humanity entail ?
Having a deep understanding takes away full responsibility.
Virtue is a form of control. But how I (Bernadette) interpret it is: there is a difference between selfish and self-full. Living a life to the fullest,...having the chance and opportunity to live it up to one’s own needs. Then not having to think: the grass is alwaysgreener on the other side.
Our intuition is influencing us all the time. There is something coming from very deep. Something that is far bigger than we are. It is part of a total unity and gives freedom. Can we grow this intuition ? Can we make it stronger ?
We are the observer behind us – this awareness lets us see: innate wrong or right,…yet there is so much external influence. There is so much conditioning….only if we learn to consciously see this condition, we will be able to live our life more according to our own will. Who decides what is right or wrong ? In the (outer judicial circumstance) I as an individual make the decision of right and wrong. This choice is determined by a feel good factor (or bad )and a feeling of gratefulness.
If everything is love,…then true love is the key…maintaining this position leads us away from the original sin,….there is then no guilt. Our action determine the karma,…when we are most happy our own dogma leads us into the truth and rightful action.
But then, there is this other side of dogma. Wanting something too much will lead into realising that the most wanted thing is not reachable. Because we want something so much,…we forget to let go,…to let things develop freely , we hold on to something and stiffen the process. The art is to always let things flow and always lay our heart and soul into the claws of god so that the universe can roll on and is not disturbed by some stiff and breaking action. Probably if we hold on to something too hard and forget about the uncertainty factor our will comes into conflict with the eternal will and it loses the smooth and soft development. We will always lose the game against fate,…if we accept that we are smaller and we become completely humble then we will envision the holy plan some times. We will be part of it and we will not be manipulator.
Because our EGO leads us away from the source.
We can still be observing and sensing keeping in touch with our own ‘goodness’. If we want to prosper we need to give unconditional love and when making wrong decisions we will see that this is part of a learning process. We can get into the spindle of self development,…evolutionary (with fully flourishing humanity as a goal),…and along the way we will find :
LOVE,…different levels of love.
maandag 4 mei 2015
Present: Otmar, Marjolein, Frédérique and Brad
As an ice-breaker I brought along a holography of a walking elephant.
The remarkable thing about the postcard was and still is,…that if you move it or look at it from different angles it appears as though the elephant is walking. In big German letters it says : Geh deinen Weg ! Which means: Go your way ! I let all my guests look at the card for some time and reflect on what they saw…then we started with the association round:
We heard music, dance, salsa, percussion, rhythm that is in the air, spring winter summer autumn, rhythm without music, trill, sound, rhythm in nature, repeating beat…and came close to a definition:
Rhythm is any recurring motion, symmetry…
this can be in nature or in man/woman made strong or weak elements, or it can be opposite or different conditions…it is a periodicity of frequencies…and the interesting thing about it is….the TIME aspect. As the topic itself came forth from our previous meeting with “TIME” as topic,…here we were back at the correlation of Rhythm and Time. Rhythm aspects can pronounce themselves in Microseconds OR: millions of years. This brings our human nature
maandag 2 februari 2015
Intro-Icebreaker: Pic of North American Indians canoeing in river
Question : What will change in the next moment ?
Imagination got going. One answer: “the eagle has landed” – the atmosphere = serene…for a good start:
Present: Hans, Mark, Michael, David, Cecilia, Farzaneh and myself
We are predestined to change. Depending on belief, political system and scientific background. Yet no matter if we believe in a soul or not,…something within us stays the same and gives us directions.
Cecilia added to the example of the person stepping into the river: “If a person steps into the river twice,...not only is the water changed, but also the person who makes that step, is not the same anymore….” Change happens on both sides,- the outside world and the inside.
After a short deviation we all agreed that personal change was where we wanted to focus our discussion on. Other changes that were mentioned: Environmental change, world change, political change, cosmic change, social change, global change, microscopic change, atomic change, personal or group change…
Hans likes to come from a broader perspective,…his thoughts came from cosmic spheres,…he talked about ‘the field`, solar flares and he said that part of our memory was outside of our brains, which had to do with electromagnetism and radio. Cecilia then inquired how that worked and before Hans could explain in more detail Michael remarked that it sounded slightly unscientific…Which brought us to an explanation about science: “Science is an assumption which has not been disproved yet.”, said Mark. David found this explanation very valuable and pondered over it for a second when Michael exclaimed : “Science is wonderful!”, with a big smile on his face.
Mark then sharply included the ‘time frame’ which made everyone aware of the ‘human frame’: Are we talking about changes in seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, years or hundreds of years …thousands of years ?
Farzaneh came with a very interesting remark: She said : “If I want to have success and I have a specific goal in mind, there cannot be much change…” In other words : if we have to focus on something very intensely we circle around a core and have no way to change much. It also means that if we are tight to a goal,…we cannot change much,…whereas if we have complete freedom, personal change is easy,...also considering political backgrounds and systems. It makes sense and explains for a great deal the character of change in a people and a person. It also explains the connection between personal change in relative free political systems opposite to a tighter structure. Also the opportunity of change that is given to a student with clear goals opposite to a person of the same age with no goals in mind. Personal change is more likely to happen in a person with freedom of choice.
To the question of the ’true self’, the ‘not changing part’ of our identity it was also Farzaneh who came up with an interesting observation. In her view we are what we do,…and identity was strictly linked to performance. And isn’t she right ? In a very dominant part of western society our identity is very closely related to what we do,…and not so much to who we are. But then again,…that might just be a momentary profession. But people will more likely ask about what you do then about who you are. Yet of course the deeper aspect of self is often far from the “what do you do ? -"question…
Our name for example does in most cases not change and therefore has quite an important meaning for our self and identity. There is some kind of attachment that influences our whole life. Yet it is just a name and the real me is somewhere else still. The core identity, the true self is of course also prone to change: Aren’t we all looking for a better me ? Isn’t it time for a real internal refurbishment (Cecilia)? And yes, says Michael,…there are many self-help books which proclaim exactly that. They teach you how to be a better you . (Mark) Business cases should be written,…they could even call for scientific proof to advertise cases of inner change and make them attractive in this economical system. There is much profit to be made with the outside change business, why not inside ?
Hans: “Our SELF,…it is something that accompanies us to the finish, ( meaning death) Hans also mentioned the soul as part of an elementary factor of our eternal being. He describes it as the small voice inside of you that tells you to do this or that. He also mentions the keys in life. Words uttered to you, or things that happened to you, way back when, that serve as keys for one’s own development. He talks about the lower self and the higher self which is not completely in yourself (!).
Michael and Hans get into a close up. Their views of life differ considerably. “We’re not from the same building,” says Michael. “We’re all one” says Hans. And he comes up with an interesting analogy. “Every wave is the sea!” What if we are all part of that same sea?
Mark defined this difference of opinions as a matter of belief and feeling. Michael brought in arguments of the evolution which arouse a great deal of interest. His question: “Is self-consciousness also part of the evolution?”
And then Hans asked the group: “Can you ever find true self without social reference?”
This question made us aware of the competitive society but also reminds us of the reflective character that seems to be needed for a sense of identity.
Michael does not believe in a soul, yet he knows for certain that there is a true self or character that does not change within a person…
Conclusion of that evening:
True change of a person is dependent on the weight of attachment one feels, believes in or is used to. That means we can change according to how strongly we feel attached to what we believe and know at the moment. The moment you let go of your bubble you learn a lot and you change, yet this change will hardly alter the inner core.(Farzaneh)
This brings Michael to another view: we are a different person depending on where we are? …but once we let go of that bubble we get a clearer picture of ourselves (Farzaneh)